Clarity and Chaos: Words, Ideas, and Universities

History is difficult. Comparative history is harder. And comparative policy – the study of ideas, power, history and practice across countries – is more challenging still. If I have learned one lesson from reading about comparative educational policy, it is to tread very carefully. Assumptions and comparisons are fraught with local complexity.

Stefan Collini is a professor of English at Cambridge University, a literary critic, and one of the most thoughtful commentators on English higher education writing today. He has made the transition to public intellectual through penetrating analysis – in academic publications and in the popular press – of English higher education policy. He writes with wit, wisdom, and informed perspective. Collini’s recent effort, Speaking of Universities, is a collection of his essays on policy and how we think , talk , and argue about higher education. It is an engaging work, written over the past few years for an audience knowledgeable about England and its educational history. However, even if you know little about English universities, the REF, TEF, the BIS, and the funding changes of 2010, there is much to learn from Collini and this book.

The essays circle around several key themes: the anemic and defensive language employed by those who purport to support universities, the deceptive and destructive language of educational consultants and corporate reformers who seek to increase the “efficiency” of universities, and the recklessness and poor consideration of the many changes reshaping English higher education policy. Collini is right, too; the ways that we talk about universities is stale, repetitive, and more often than not misses what is important. The debate is neither constructive nor headed in a way that leads to positive change. New ways of talking about university, research, and learning are needed. These concerns have relevance to America and other countries.

I found Collini’s analysis of the structure of the discussion around higher education reform particularly provocative. He notes that government officials (or educational bureaucrats/decision-makers) presume to understand the public’s wants and needs – and therefore justify their “reforms” to higher education as means to ensure that this imaginary public is better served. Collini takes apart the very concept of that idealized “public.” He argues effectively that there are many “publics.” Noting that universities invariably struggle to address their publics’ competing wants, he rightly insists that we must get out of the government-university-public triad mindset. Collini emphasizes that universities and their defenders need not craft their arguments solely as defensive. He references reports, scholarship about what has and has not helped over the years. He questions why “markets” are assumed to be the best framework to think about education. His aim is to reframe and reconceptualize the form and tools used in our debates of policy. Collini wants a better way to talk about universities.

It isn’t all grim going; there is much humor in the book. Collini skewers management consultant speak with Orwellian accuracy. He recounts a few of his own foibles, and writes with true compassion about what it means to be an academic. If you care about ideas and teaching, you know that an institution of higher education is much more than metrics, measures, outcomes and reports. It is about how we humanize each other and ourselves, reaching for something better. In Speaking of Universities, Stefan Collini reminds us of this and more.

David Potash

Vision and Elite Institutions

Many of the forces that make for quality in higher education are isomorphic:  impactful faculty scholarship and research, bigger libraries, better prepared students, more opportunities for academic and student support. Many of them simply boil down to more institutional money. It is a challenge to be different and to be better. That question is at…

Scandalous Schools

I don’t read Vanity Fair all that often. A few years back, when my dentist was fancy, copies of the magazine were in her waiting room. I read it. She consistently tried to up sell dental improvements, though, and once I tired of saying “no thanks” to the filling upgrades and invisible braces, I changed…

Locating the Finish Line: Completion Several Years On

Eight years ago, William Bowen, Matthew Chingos, and Michael McPherson wrote Crossing the Finish Line: Completing College at America’s Public Universities. A massive longitudinal study of student completions at a host of four-year public flagship institutions and state systems, the book was immediately recognized as an important work, a milestone in the effort to improve…

Political Science Prescience

Many years ago, as an undergraduate at Rice University, I took a course on political ideology. I wasn’t a political science major and I didn’t know anything about the professor, Fred Von der Mehden, before signing up. The class fit my schedule and completed a distribution requirement. My expectations were not high. I remember getting…

Undoing and Doing Together

It is rare to find a nonfiction page-turner about faculty and higher education. Faculty may be doing exciting and interesting things on a daily basis, but we do not often find about them on best-seller lists. Until Michael Lewis. Lewis is an extraordinarily successful writer. Beyond his journalism, magazine work and lesser-known efforts, he has…

Unacceptable is Unacceptable

Years ago I read a short piece about Richard Feynman, the Nobel-award winning physicist. I was intrigued. A genius who had the chops to work at the leading edge of his field and the communication skills to make science understandable to the public, he was known as brilliant, eccentric, dynamic, and the kind of thinker…